Methodology
Trust comes from showing
the work.
Videos, captions, descriptions, model output, and retailer pages begin as untrusted source material. The directory publishes a smaller, reviewed subset with its evidence attached.
01 / Publication path
From video to public fact
- 01
Find a disclosure
A public video or uploader description identifies a player and discusses equipment.
- 02
Extract a draft
Gemini can propose atomic claims and timestamps. Every proposal begins pending.
- 03
Check the source
A reviewer compares each claim with accessible video, transcript, frames, or the uploader description and records the method used.
- 04
Explain every hold
Every pending claim needs a reason and a concrete next source check before the record can pass publication checks.
- 05
Publish the accepted subset
Only verified or corrected values appear as facts. The interface can show which fields remain under review without exposing their proposed values.
02 / Claim decisions
Four statuses, two public
Verified
The checked source supports the value and its attribution.
Corrected
The source supports a reviewer-corrected value, with the original attempt retained for audit.
Pending
The value stays hidden, but its review reason and next source check are recorded.
Rejected
The source does not support the model's proposed claim.
03 / Guardrails
What we refuse to smooth over
An old video or rating stays historical. It is never silently presented as current.
“Previous version,” “around 55,” and unresolved gauge remain exactly that.
Players are not merged across videos by first name, appearance, or assumption.
A retail listing can help normalize a name, but it cannot prove what was actually used.
Backup, borrowed, challenge, and regular rackets remain separate when the source distinguishes them.
A second model pass is still model agreement—not independent verification.